Issue link: http://winesandvines.uberflip.com/i/264184
p r a c t i c a l w i n e r y & v i n e ya r d M a r c H 2 0 1 4 55 g r a p e g r o w i n g Bringing Artisan Beer, Wine and Spirits to Market Everything post-production to make your craft beverage stand out. Now there's an all-new, completely unique conference and expo that's focused 100% on giving you the specifi c tools, strategies, suppliers and connections you need to bring your craft beverages competitively to market. If you want to get your product out there where it belongs, get here fi rst. M A Y 6 - 8 , 2 0 1 4 | S A N J O S E C O N V E N T I O N C E N T E R R E G I S T E R T O D A Y A T www.CraftBeverageExpo.com. as the available soil volume was reduced. 16 This implies that root volume and/or distribution have a direct effect on vine performance. Table II illustrates how soil type and root distribution can influence the amount of readily available water (RAW) that is potentially accessible to a grapevine. By restricting roots to the vine row in sand and sandy loam examples, the vol- ume of RAW, expressed as either per vine or per area, is reduced by about 33%. This situation occurs in vineyards where soil compaction within the tractor row pre- vents roots from growing laterally. 18 In the clay soil example where root growth is restricted both horizontally and verti- cally, the volume of RAW is reduced by about 80%. Limited vertical root growth is also commonly found in vineyards. 18 Several soil modification techniques are available to overcome restrictive root zones and reduce vine dependence on irrigation by improving water acquisi- tion including: •ripping to overcome physical restric- tions such as compaction layers and rock, •drainage to overcome anaerobic envi- ronments due to water-logging, •mounding to increase the volume of soil for root development, •application of surface and sub-surface amendments such as lime to correct pH imbalances and gypsum to ameliorate soil structure by exchanging calcium for sodium, • application of surface mulches and/or compost to improve soil organic matter levels and reduce evaporative losses. Soil modification techniques have been applied across a range of soil types, and such practices should be aligned to varia- tions in soil characteristics to optimize their effect. 14,15,19 There is a need to know how responses to different modification techniques vary in relation to the spatial variability of the vineyard. The use of high-resolution spa- tial data and geostatistical techniques provides a solution to this problem by enabling highly replicated designs in Table II. Hypothe cal combina ons of soil type and root distribu on showing their influence on the amount of stored soil water that is poten ally available to the vines (assume 2 meter x 3 meter vine x tractor row spacing). Soil type Readily available Roo ng dimensions Readily available Readily available water (mm/m) (vine row x width water (L/vine) water (ML/ha) (-8 to -60 kPa) x depth) Sand 37 Whole vineyard area 266 0.44 (2m x 3m x 1.2m) Sand 37 Restricted to vine row 89 0.15 (2m x 1m x 1.2m) Sandy Loam 64 Whole vineyard area 384 0.64 (2m x 3m x 1m) Sandy Loam 64 Restricted to vine row 128 0.21 (2m x 1m x 1m) Clay 57 Whole vineyard area 256 0.43 (2m x 3m x 0.75m) Clay 57 Restricted to vine row 57 0.09 and limited depth (2m x 1m x 0.5m)