Wines & Vines

November 2017 Equipment, Supplies & Services Issue

Issue link: http://winesandvines.uberflip.com/i/892087

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 28 of 99

November 2017 WINES&VINES 29 VIEWPOINT demand for higher end wines, the vast majority of wines won't ever make sense to ship direct. From a winery's perspective, it's not until you get to the $20 and up category that extra margin a winery makes on a sale consistently outweighs the shipping costs. • So, what sorts of wine do make sense for both wineries and consum- ers to order direct? Those they can't find, or at least can't find nearby. Di- rect shipping opens up the power and opportunities of long-tail mar- keting to wine lovers and producers. We don't produce enough volume or have enough demand to have wines on the shelves of dozens of stores in each state outside of California. So, in many cases, consumers don't have any Tablas Creek on the shelf anywhere near them. And if they do, it's likely that what's easiest to find is our Patelin de Tablas line, which makes up about 70% of what we sell wholesale nationally. What if they've read about our Vermentino, or our new Terret Noir? Too bad. So it's un- likely to surprise anyone that more than half of what we sold direct was our small-production varietals and blends that aren't found in distribu- tion, and the Patelin wines made up just 15% of direct sales. • I would guess that most wineries' data would show trends similar to ours, and it's backed up anecdotally. On a recent visit to another high- end winery near us, our server ex- plained that they have two entirely separate lineups of wine for their wholesale sales and tasting room. And, of course, a large number of wineries don't distribute any of their wine nationally. Restaurants work differently Although many restaurants offer corkage, where customers can bring in their own wines and have them served at their table for a fee, and there are some states that allow wineries to sell direct to restaurants, the challenging logistics and planning (and cost) required means that nearly 100% of wine sold in a restaurant comes through a state- licensed wholesaler. Does opening direct shipping impact restaurant sales negatively? Not at all. And we have found it is our wine club members (read: superfans) who are the most likely to order our wines at a restaurant. They feel a proprietary pride in the success of their favorite wineries, and when they are dining with friends and see a winery they patronize on a restaurant list, it often spurs the peer-to-peer sharing that starts new cus- tomers on the path to fandom. If we can't ship direct to a state, it's a lot harder to sign up wine club members. (They can, of course, have wine shipped to friends or relatives in nearby shipping-allowed states, but that's cumbersome and difficult.) And the restau- rant sales those club members will make don't happen. Direct shipping changes wineries' incentives All those reasons aside, I think the most im- portant reason that we have seen our whole- sale sales increase in state after state after that state opens to direct shipping is this last one. Judging from our own actions, it's not in our interest to lavish the same amount of attention on states where we are prohibited from shipping directly as we do to states where we can ship. I know that before 2015, I hadn't visited the Massachusetts market in several years, despite that I went to both high school and college in Massachusetts and have lots of friends—and sports teams—I love to see in Boston. Economically speaking, it just wasn't worth it. By contrast, I went every year to states like New York or Illinois, where we could ship. On a normal market visit, I would go, spend my days working with our distributor reps to get the wines into new accounts, and spend my evenings doing consumer events at restaurants or wine shops. I could help ensure that those events succeeded, making the accounts that host them happy, by promoting the events to our consumer mailing list in the area. And I could come out of those events with a new collection of names that I can add to our mailing list. This makes these people more likely to come out to Tablas Creek and even- tually join our wine club or buy wine from us. Everyone is happy. In a non-shipping state, I can still do the work days with the distributor, but I can't do much to help pro- mote consumer events (so they're less likely to be successful), and I can't do much with any consumer contacts I make at these events. Both time and marketing dollars are finite for any winery. Wineries are only be- having rationally by focusing their attention where they can have the greatest impact, which means that states without direct ship- ping don't get as much winery-level help with their wholesale sales. Whatever the reason or combination of rea- sons, Massachusetts isn't the only state where we've seen wholesale sales increase in the af- termath of the state opening to direct shipping. It has happened again and again. Between 2005 and 2013, our wholesale sales rose an average of 8% per year. Check out how much some of the larger states (that opened to direct shipping over that period) grew in the first two years after they allowed direct shipping. On average, our wholesale sales in these seven locations increased 51.9% in the two years after we received our direct-shipping permit. Why was Florida the one state to decline? I didn't realize it had, until I pulled this data. But I have a few guesses. First, it's a state from which we see relatively few visitors, at least for the size of its population. It's also a state with a very spread-out popu- lation (unlike, say, in New York or Washing- ton, D.C.), and it's hard to schedule events in places that are central to a collection of mailing list members. We also struggled to set up good consumer events in our early years there, so I doubt we were able to lever- age or build our mailing list particularly ef- ficiently. Anyway, the rest of the states show a pretty strong trend, and given that Florida is currently our No. 4 state for wholesale sales and has grown steadily in recent years, I'm not going to worry too much about the one data point. Instead, I booked flights for my second work trip this year to Boston. I flew in Tues- day. Wednesday, I worked with one of our distributor's top reps, and we got Tablas Creek into some cool restaurants and (fin- gers crossed) Fenway Park. I hosted a deli- cious dinner at Porto in Boston's Back Bay, where half the attendees were mailing list members. Thursday, I did it all again, and caught the Patriots season opener on TV with some friends who live in Massachusetts. Fri- day I flew home. And none of this would have happened if Massachusetts—with a push from former Patriot turned vintner Drew Bledsoe—hadn't decided to open its borders to wine shipping two years ago. Jason Haas has been general manager of Tablas Creek Vineyard in the Paso Robles wine district of California since 2006. He is chairman of the board of directors of the Paso Robles Wine Country Alliance, a past president of the Rhône Rangers and a former board member of the Family Winemakers of California. Haas adapted this opinion piece from a post he wrote recently for the Tablas Creek Vineyard blog. CHANGE IN WHOLESALE SALES OF TABLAS CREEK WINE AFTER DIRECT SHIPPING ENACTED Location Year Opened to Direct shipping Wholesale Sales Change During First Two Years New York 2005 +68.0% Florida 2006 -38.1% Texas 2006 +61.7% Ohio 2007 +14.3% Georgia 2008 +24.0% Washington, D.C. 2008 +72.5% Maryland 2011 +160.9%

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Wines & Vines - November 2017 Equipment, Supplies & Services Issue