Wines & Vines

January 2014 Unified Symposium Issue

Issue link: http://winesandvines.uberflip.com/i/235941

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 47 of 147

grapegrowing Mean monthly discharge (left) and daily discharge (right) is shown in cfs for water years 1951 to 2012 at United States Geological Survey stream gauging station 11468000 on the Navarro River near Navarro, Mendocino County, Calif. protection events, the SWRCB still wanted to implement regulations and fees to discourage the practice. In 2012, several growers sued the SWRCB, and a local judge found that the proposed rules were not supported by substantial evidence in the record. SWRCB failed to follow proper procedure to declare frost protection with water as "unreasonable." They also failed to follow the rule of water rights priority 48 W in e s & V i ne s January 20 14 and didn't take economic impacts into account. The SWRCB is appealing, and this suit will no doubt continue for a long time. What growers have done Even though the winegrowing industry has won the first round of this legal skirmish, there are definite changes in attitudes and practice. In both the Navarro and Russian River watersheds, many vineyards have their own reservoirs to impound water when river flows are high. Growers have revalved their sprinkler systems for frost protection so that they only turn on water in the areas most likely to freeze. Weather instrumentation and frost forecasting are being improved. There is a new gauge on the main stem of the Russian River that allows a more active water-

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Wines & Vines - January 2014 Unified Symposium Issue