Wines & Vines

April 2018 Harvest Winery Equipment & Oak Alternatives

Issue link: http://winesandvines.uberflip.com/i/957564

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 17 of 91

WINE INDUSTRY NEWS EFFORT. ContiTech ExtremeFlex™ beverage hose with EZ Clean cover takes the hard work out of keeping your facility looking its shiny best. Just hose its patented cover down with water. There's no need for harsh cleaning agents or scrubbing. That reduces labor costs as well as bacteria buildup. Plus, it also works wonders in tight quarters or tight bend connections with its extreme flex capability. Want to give scrubbing the brush off? ContiTech. We Have an Answer for That. INDUSTRIAL AND HYDRAULIC HOSE • POWER TRANSMISSION PRODUCTS • CONVEYOR BELT V ancouver, British Columbia – Supreme Court of Canada justices were expected to decide in March a ruling in the matter of Gérard Comeau, a New Brunswick resident caught red- handed by the famed Royal Cana- d i a n M o u n t e d Po l i c e a s h e returned from the neighboring province of Quebec with 14 cases of beer and three bottles of spirits in violation of New Brunswick li- quor laws governing the interpro- vincial movement of wine. Word of the pending ruling was the talk of the day at the ninth annual wine law seminar that Seattle-based Law Seminars Inter- national hosted in Vancouver on February 26, days after Alberta called off a ban on imports of B.C. wine implemented in response to B.C.'s opposition to construction of a pipeline carrying bitumen from Alberta to processing facili- ties in Vancouver. Alberta vs. British Columbia Alberta backed off the ban after B.C. Premier John Horgan pledged to ask the courts to decide whether or not B.C. has the right to restrict what products cross its boundar- ies, mirroring a court challenge the B.C. Wine Institute threatened to take regarding Alberta's ban on B.C. wine. A détente now exists, but Al- berta hasn't disbanded a task force convened to advise its premier on the issue and the BC Wine Insti- tute hasn't ruled out a court chal- lenge of the Alberta ban. "We remain concerned that any provincial government be- lieves it has the constitutional authority to impose trade bans on Canadian products based on their place of origin," BCWI said in a statement circulated to media on February 22. "It's still a live issue," lawyer Shea Coulson told the seminar, who represented five wineries from the ad hoc Coalition of Small B.C. Wineries that were granted intervener status when the Su- preme Court of Canada heard the Comeau case in December. The coalition claims to repre- sent more than 100 British Colum- bia wineries seeking changes to interprovincial shipping laws, something Coulson expects to fol- low from the Supreme Court's rul- ing in the coming days. "There's no status quo deci- sion. Whatever the decision is, it will have a resounding impact," he told the room of lawyers, win- ery principals and wine trade pro- fessionals. "The debate is between whether there will be an affirma- tion of a protectionist vision of Canada or will there be a liberal, free trade interpretation." Coulson expects a modest liberalization referencing the spat between Alberta and B.C. The timing of the decision sug- gests this, as well as the un- usual speed – just three months a f t e r t h e D e c e m b e r h e a r i n g rather than six months origi- nally expected. "If there's a liberalization, it will be very restrictive, most likely, and it will probably deal with something like the Alberta wine ban in B.C., because that is a po- litically motivated protectionist policy on its face," he explained. —Peter Mitham Canadian Supreme Court Deliberates Wine Case "Whatever the decision is, it will have a resounding impact." —Shea Coulson, attorney for British Columbia wineries

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Wines & Vines - April 2018 Harvest Winery Equipment & Oak Alternatives