Wines & Vines

July 2017 Technology Issue

Issue link: http://winesandvines.uberflip.com/i/840286

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 49 of 67

WINERY & VINEYARD EQUIPMENT 50 WINES&VINES July 2017 equipment is pore size, because selec- tion of the wrong membrane pore size can have a material effect on a wine's quality. Microfiltration: Equipment for microfiltra- tion almost universally uses the 0.2µ pore size. The polyethylene (PE) construction material has a very low affinity for anything in wine and has become the preferred material for microfiltration. For this reason, PE is a better compromise for the greatest permeate flux versus fouling the mem- brane from constituent particles. Ultrafiltration: From ultrafiltration (UF) downward, membranes separate their component parts based on a combination of molecular weight and effective molecular diameter, and the membranes are defined in broad areas of their theoretical and actual MWCO. At this level of molecular separa- tion, the term "dalton" is used for a unit expressing molecular weight of proteins. Ultrafiltration begins with membranes that separate compounds from 1,000 to 100,000 daltons. Membranes used in crossflow categories such as ultrafiltration are made to separate a relatively narrow range of compounds. For example, an ultrafiltration membrane rated 10,000 daltons would have an average MWCO from 9,500 to 10,500, meaning 100% of molecules less than 9,500 would pass, and some lesser amounts would pass up to 10,500. All compounds above that would be retained. The table of molecular weights of com- mon compounds found in wine shows that many compounds are smaller than ultrafiltration membranes should retain. Why, then, is it not used to clarify wine on a general basis? Aside from the fact that flux rates for normal clarification process- ing are terrible, ultrafiltration affects the structure and texture of wines by hinder- ing the three-dimensional aspects of the compounds. It also affects colloidal formation and waters of hydration that are found around larger polyphenols and other important wine compounds. These factors can make a compound seem larger than it actually is from a membrane transmission standpoint. UF can be used for concentra- tion of certain factors, but with care and a purpose. Do small-scale trials. Nanofiltration / reverse osmosis: These SCOTT LABORATORIES INC. SCOTT LABORATORIES LTD. (CANADA) The VLS crossflow system distributed by Scott Laboratories is a modular design. You can buy the system with cartridges and then add ad- ditional element cartridge loops as are needed up to nine cartridges. Each element is the typ- ical 10 m 2 of most suppliers. The nominal flow rates range from 1,135 liters per hour for the three cartridge unit to 3,406 liters per hour for the nine-cartridge unit. There is a feed pump with a pre-filter to protect the membranes from fouling with large particles. A digital flow meter and pressure sensor mon- itor inlet and outlet pressures. The programmable logic controller operates the basic parameters including flow rate, amount to filter and start/stop time. Options include a turbidity meter and an automatic cleaning option that controls the parameters for cleaning in place (CIP). This includes peristaltic pumps for measuring in the CIP materials and a temperature probe to assure the system does not overheat these materials. scottlab.com (U.S.), scottlabsltd.com (Canada) —continued from page 49

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Wines & Vines - July 2017 Technology Issue