Wines & Vines

January 2014 Practical Winery & Vineyard

Issue link: http://winesandvines.uberflip.com/i/235959

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 55 of 67

w i inneeGM A K IN GG w R O WIN Table I: Table of molecular SO2 concentrations over pH % of Free ppm free ppm free Sulfur for 0.8 for 0.5 pH Molecular SO2 MolecularMolecular 2.90 2.95 3.00 3.05 3.10 3.15 3.20 3.25 3.30 3.35 3.40 3.45 3.50 3.55 3.60 3.65 3.70 3.75 3.80 3.85 3.90 3.95 4.00 7.5 6.6 6.1 5.3 4.9 4.3 3.9 3.4 3.1 2.7 2.5 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 11 12 13 15 16 19 21 23 26 29 32 37 40 46 50 57 63 72 79 91 99 114 125 7 7 8 9 10 12 13 15 16 18 20 23 25 29 31 36 39 45 49 57 62 71 78 Adapted from: Enology Briefs 1 (#1), Feb/Mar 1982. University of California Cooperative Extension dation; however it does not act by directly removing oxygen from wines and musts. Although the sulfite ion (SO3=) can bind with oxygen, there is very litle sulfite ion present in solution at the pH range found in wine (see Figure I). Rather sulfur dioxide prevents oxidation by binding with the precursors involved in oxidative reactions preventing them from reacting with oxygen or by binding with compounds already oxidized to reverse oxygen's effect. Sulfur dioxide also acts by reducing the activity of the degenerative enzyme tyrosinase (polyphenol oxidase), which is present in juice. Because of sulfur dioxide's ability to bind with the precursors and the products of oxidation, it can be used as both a preventative and a treatment. For example, an oxidized white wine with a brown tint and a nutty smell can be improved with an addition of sulfur dioxide that bleaches out some of the dark color and binds with the acetaldehyde to reduce the nutty smell. Antimicrobial role of sulfur dioxide Sulfur dioxide is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent that has an inhibitory affect on a wide variety of microorganisms. The level of sulfur dioxide at which the microbe, either yeast or bacteria, is affected varies widely by species. This 56 p r acti c al w i ne ry & v i ne yard JANUARY 20 14 Figure III: Formula for potassium metabisulfite addition (gallons of wine) x 3.785) x (ppm of addition) = grams of KMB to add (1000) x (0.576) 3.785 is the conversion from gallons to liters 1000 converts mg/L (ppm) to g/L 0.576 is the fraction of SO2 in KMB This formula can be simplified to: (gallons of wine) x (ppm of addition) x (0.0066) = grams of KMB to add variation allows winemakers to use sulfur dioxide to treat microbes in the wine or must selectively and inhibit or kill undesirable microbes without harming the desirable ones. It has been understood since the early 1900s that only the free forms of sulfur dioxide (and not the bound) have an antimicrobial effect. It was further discovered in the 1960s that molecular SO2 was several hundred times more effective than bisulfite. The mechanism for sulfur dioxide's antimicrobial affect works by the sulfur dioxide entering the microbe and disrupting the activity of the enzymes and proteins of the cell. Since only the molecular form of sulfur dioxide can enter through the cell membrane, it is the concentration of molecular sulfur dioxide that controls microbial growth. Although there is some evidence that a high concentration of acetaldehydebound bisulfite inhibits the growth of some species of malolactic bacteria, this effect is eclipsed by the role of molecular SO 2 . Since the percentage of free SO 2 that is in the molecular form is dependent on pH, the importance of pH in the effectiveness of sulfur dioxide and the microbial stability of wine in general cannot be overstated. Effect of sulfur dioxide on yeast and malolactic bacteria Sulfur dioxide has some degree of inhibitory affect on all yeast; however, the Saccharomyces yeast strains that are used by winemakers for alcoholic fermentation are much more resistant to it than "wild" yeasts are. Wild yeast is the term used for a number of non-Saccharomyces species of ambient yeast that are present on grapes and in the winery cellar. Wild yeast are sensitive to both sulfur dioxide and alcohol. Wild yeast can begin a spontaneous fermentation in juice but soon are killed by the alcohol that they produce. At this point, the Saccharomyces that is present, either indigenous to the grapes or added by the winemaker, which is more resistant to alcohol takes over to complete the fermentation. Wild yeast can sometimes be the source of off-flavors therefore most winemakers elect to control them with a small dose of sulfur dioxide and then inoculate the must with a commercial wine strain of Saccharomyces. A molecular SO2 level of 0.4 ppm (equivalent to a free SO2 level of 20 ppm at 3.50 pH) will kill wild yeast without adversely affecting Saccharomyces. The inhibitory effect of sulfur dioxide on malolactic fermentation is much greater than it is for the alcoholic fermentation that is performed by Saccharomyces yeast. Malolactic fermentation (often abbreviated to ML fermentation or MLF), is the secondary fermentation by bacteria that converts malic acid found in grape juice to lactic acid, which is less acidic. There are several species of bacteria that are capable of MLF in wine, some more desirable than others. Oenococcus oeni, the most commonly used species of malolactic bacteria, is very sensitive to sulfur dioxide and has difficulty growing at levels above 25 ppm total SO2 . The sensitivity of malolactic bacteria to sulfur dioxide can be used by winemakers to influence the flavor of a wine. MLF has several effects on the flavor of a wine, it lowers the acidity and it can produce a "buttery" aroma, particularly in white wines. In addition to these sensory qualities, it makes a wine more microbiologically stable. If the MLF is completed in the cellar prior to bottling, you do not have to worry about it occurring after bottling and spoiling the wine. If you wish to make a more tart, fruit forward wine such as a Riesling or Sauvignon Blanc, MLF would not be as appropriate and MLF can be prevented by an early dose of sulfur dioxide. In a wine that will be aged for a longer period in barrels, or if you desire a softer less acidic character, MLF is more appropriate. Chardonnay and red wines often are put through MLF either prior to or during ageing. Effect of sulfur dioxide on wine spoilage microorganisms Although there are no human pathogens that can grow in wine, there are a number

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Wines & Vines - January 2014 Practical Winery & Vineyard